The full story

The gap in protection

Workforce harassment

I asked whether the protections every other city employee has apply to me. As I was told, they mostly do not.

Chapter 5 of 9 · 1 minute read

Illustrative photo of an empty meeting table

I met with the city attorney and the police chief, then asked them to speak together because we were working in silos.

The civil side

The city attorney looked at a workplace-harassment restraining order. Because I am an elected official, the conduct did not meet that standard.

The criminal side

The police chief explained that the behavior stayed just short of criminal harassment. Both said the scrutiny that applies to public officials is higher than for a private resident.

A gap worth closing

The result is a gap. A regular employee in the same situation might qualify for protection. An elected official, who is paid by the city but is not an ordinary employee, often does not. My next step was to send full documentation to the District Attorney.

I think that gap is worth closing carefully, with a higher bar than for private citizens on speech about public policy and a clear line when conduct becomes stalking.

The next chapter

Let’s keep the conversation going.

I am writing a book and a case study, and planning workshops and a peer community for officials, candidates and staff.